Featuring:
- Mahler Symphony No. 9
Ilan Volkov - Conductor
Mahler. Wouldn't you just die without him? Sigh.
Alright, the concert was emotionally draining. Ilan Volkov presented a very solid reading of Mahler 9 where extreme in dynamics and tempo are pushed to the limit. Let's break it down one by one.
In the opening of the first movement, there was a slightly unclean entry of the 2nd horn. Also just to nitpick things a bit further, I would prefer the first entry of the 4th horn to be softer. After that, tempo wise, I love the unveiling of the 2 note sighing motif. I could talk more about the entry of each instruments, but I'll stop here. Generally, the mood shift and dynamics which are the characteristics of the first movement are well done. Climaxes are overwhelming, although the last climax in which the trombones and timpani came back and bolt down the irregular heart beat motif was not as strong as I want it to be. The duet of flute and horn in the end was effective, but MSO didn't come as clean as they could have in the very last note of the first movement. Despite all these little nitpickings that I did, I enjoyed this movement very much.
I can't say that the 2nd movement of Mahler 9 spoke directly to my heart in general, regardless of who performed it. There's wonderful music there, but that's just it. I still love the 3 dances in this movement, especially the last dance whose motif is derived from the sighing motif of the first movement. Again, the tempo change between the slow (1st and 3rd) dances and fast (2nd) is drastic. What I love the most in this performance is the strong colour from the contrabassoon in the closing bars of this movement.
From the tranquility of village dances, we are thrown into cosmopolitan lifestyle in the third movement. What an achievement by Mahler! He pictured the chaos of city life with fugal music and God knows how many lines of music playing at the same time. The chorale like melody in the middle section played by the trumpet (wonderfully in this concert!) provided a welcome mood change. I was quite touched with it before that melody is mocked and tossed around right after the heart-touching tenderness moment from the development of the chorale. Moment after that, we're back into the city streets again. Chaotic music returns, and the music picked up the pace and ending up being an orchestral show piece. Small complaint, the snare drum that appeared out of nowhere just before the very end could be louder to enhance the surprise effect.
The last movement. Oh, what gorgeous music this is. Ilan's tempo is to my liking, letting all the strings sing out beautifully in the opening. The tension builds up throughout. Jumping straight to the meditative section where the woodwinds with the harp accompaniment dominated the melody before THE climax of the piece: these passages of 3 minutes long are the moment where I was undone. Tears just flow down, I can't help it. I was overwhelmed with all sort of emotions when the strings came in at fortissimo when the music burst out again to the opening motif of the finale. I couldn't care less of what happened after that. I still vividly remembered the trombones, horns and cymbals crashing down just before all the instruments die down just for the strings to sing out the main theme. Ilan took this moment just a bit too fast to my liking, but really I couldn't care less. Not until towards the cello solo in the end did I regain my composure again. The ending is bittersweet and heartfelt. There's a good 30 seconds to 1 minute silence in the end after the music ended.
Orchestra playing wise: strings and woodwinds were the pick tonight. Wilma Smith, Katharine Brockman, and David Berlin gave wonderful solos throughout the piece. The horns were a bit sketchy tonight. While still wonderful, timpani could've sounded a bit punchier. There were a small number of miss-entries, but the playing standard is very high overall. The hall is around 60-70% full, a shame for what was a wonderful Mahler 9 reading.
Next concert: Beethoven 6 and Sibelius Violin Concerto; this Friday.
Showing posts with label mahler. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mahler. Show all posts
Monday, 27 July 2009
Sunday, 8 March 2009
Melbourne Symphony Orchestra concert 6 March 2009 - Resurrection
Featuring:
- Lili Boulanger Psalm 129 for chorus and orchestra Australian Premiere
- Mahler Symphony No. 2 'Resurrection'
Penelope Mills - Soprano
Bernadette Cullen - Mezzo-soprano
Melbourne Symphony Orchestra Chorus: Jonathan Grieves-Smith - Chorus Master
Oleg Caetani - Conductor
First MSO concert in Hamer Hall this season, and it was a great one. It started with Lili Boulanger's settings of Psalm 129. The piece was great, and the orchestra played well. My minor complaint was the slight unclear French pronunciation of the choir. The irony of this piece is that, while on its own it can make a great impression on attention-paying audience, it is soon subdued by Mahler's symphony and couldn't have a greater effect.
Mahler's symphonies are always titanic, and I don't think any sensible directors will ever place his symphonies to start a concert. Just like Sviatoslav Richter's comment on Beethoven's Appassionata sonata: "It always belong to the end of a piano recital, since there cannot be anything grander, so that anything that comes after will only be diminished in effect by the boundless force of this music." However, the Resurrection symphony won't only diminish any music that comes after it (fortunately, there weren't any that night), but it also negated the effect of music that came before it, i.e. Boulinger's Psalm 129 settings. Clive O'Connell, The Age reviewer of this concert, did not even mention Boulinger's music in his review although it was the Australian Premiere of that music.
The good thing about the concert is, it was one of the best concert I've attended in MSO. Starting with the sudden outburst in strings, and the grim funeral theme (with emphasis in the first note of the theme) in cello and basses, the first movement transformed into something lighter in the second theme of the movement courtesy of fine playing from the winds section. Then the funeral march came back again, cymbals crashing to mark the climax of the movement in I don't know how many f's. The climax needs to be overwhelming and the loud dynamics from the orchestra helped to achieve that effect. It's probably in the same level of dynamics as the finale of Mahler 1 when I attended it around one year ago. The grimness of this movement cannot be denied when we reached the end of the first movement. The double basses are very fine throughout providing clear base line and credit to harp sections for their clear, precise playing.
The second movement brought back the nostalgic feeling with some troubled episode in between. It was played clean, and crisp: the viola section gave a wonderful reading of their part which I think is one of the most beautiful theme composed by Mahler.
The timpani stroke which opened the third movement cannot be any more clear as a wake up call, and the principal timpanist played it to great effect. Great playing, with the cry of despair moment might have actually scared off some people who have not accustomed with this symphony yet.
The Urlicht came tenderly, the mezzo soprano gave a wonderful reading of it. Credit also to the principal oboist giving a beautiful duet with the mezzo.
The cry of despair came back again to signal the beginning of the finale, and the resurrection theme was announced. The brass section was really wonderful that night: trombones, trumpets, horns sections played their hearts out. Caetani really paid attention to small details: The offstage brass achieved the desired effect, the little trills in the woodwinds are emphasised. The march of the dead was hair rising. The choir then came in, the duet of Soprano and Mezzo soprano was good, but could be more heart-melting, the end was overwhelming as it could be, but unfortunately THE ORGAN WAS NOT INVOLVED IN THE END!! To be honest, that is my main disappointment of the performance, apart from minor wrong note playing from the horns.
It also needs to be noticed that the woodwinds section lift their instruments when playing several passages, as with the horn section. There were 30 violins (16 first, 14 second), the largest I've seen so far, if I remember correctly. There was a poor violist who played by herself behind the other pairs because there was no more room in the stage to fit another violist. And what sound did 10 horns make in the end! The 85% full hall gave a rousing applause at the conclusion of the piece. It must have been around 10 minutes of applause for the orchestra in the end.
For me, I practically had goose bumps all over during the first and third movements. In the fifth movement, I can barely contain myself to not join the choir singing the Resurrection text and also not to sing out the main theme from the orchestra of which I know by heart. I left the concert emotionally drained. Such an effect this symphony has for its listeners, I am still moved every time (although I've listened to it for 30-40 times already). This concert serves as a reminder to me: Mahler is always best live. And also, "Wouldn't you just die without Mahler?"
Next concert: Ashkenazy (Yes, Vladimir Ashkenazy) in Strauss' epic Also Sprach Zarathustra + Janine Jansen playing Saint Saens' 3rd violin concerto next week.
- Lili Boulanger Psalm 129 for chorus and orchestra Australian Premiere
- Mahler Symphony No. 2 'Resurrection'
Penelope Mills - Soprano
Bernadette Cullen - Mezzo-soprano
Melbourne Symphony Orchestra Chorus: Jonathan Grieves-Smith - Chorus Master
Oleg Caetani - Conductor
First MSO concert in Hamer Hall this season, and it was a great one. It started with Lili Boulanger's settings of Psalm 129. The piece was great, and the orchestra played well. My minor complaint was the slight unclear French pronunciation of the choir. The irony of this piece is that, while on its own it can make a great impression on attention-paying audience, it is soon subdued by Mahler's symphony and couldn't have a greater effect.
Mahler's symphonies are always titanic, and I don't think any sensible directors will ever place his symphonies to start a concert. Just like Sviatoslav Richter's comment on Beethoven's Appassionata sonata: "It always belong to the end of a piano recital, since there cannot be anything grander, so that anything that comes after will only be diminished in effect by the boundless force of this music." However, the Resurrection symphony won't only diminish any music that comes after it (fortunately, there weren't any that night), but it also negated the effect of music that came before it, i.e. Boulinger's Psalm 129 settings. Clive O'Connell, The Age reviewer of this concert, did not even mention Boulinger's music in his review although it was the Australian Premiere of that music.
The good thing about the concert is, it was one of the best concert I've attended in MSO. Starting with the sudden outburst in strings, and the grim funeral theme (with emphasis in the first note of the theme) in cello and basses, the first movement transformed into something lighter in the second theme of the movement courtesy of fine playing from the winds section. Then the funeral march came back again, cymbals crashing to mark the climax of the movement in I don't know how many f's. The climax needs to be overwhelming and the loud dynamics from the orchestra helped to achieve that effect. It's probably in the same level of dynamics as the finale of Mahler 1 when I attended it around one year ago. The grimness of this movement cannot be denied when we reached the end of the first movement. The double basses are very fine throughout providing clear base line and credit to harp sections for their clear, precise playing.
The second movement brought back the nostalgic feeling with some troubled episode in between. It was played clean, and crisp: the viola section gave a wonderful reading of their part which I think is one of the most beautiful theme composed by Mahler.
The timpani stroke which opened the third movement cannot be any more clear as a wake up call, and the principal timpanist played it to great effect. Great playing, with the cry of despair moment might have actually scared off some people who have not accustomed with this symphony yet.
The Urlicht came tenderly, the mezzo soprano gave a wonderful reading of it. Credit also to the principal oboist giving a beautiful duet with the mezzo.
The cry of despair came back again to signal the beginning of the finale, and the resurrection theme was announced. The brass section was really wonderful that night: trombones, trumpets, horns sections played their hearts out. Caetani really paid attention to small details: The offstage brass achieved the desired effect, the little trills in the woodwinds are emphasised. The march of the dead was hair rising. The choir then came in, the duet of Soprano and Mezzo soprano was good, but could be more heart-melting, the end was overwhelming as it could be, but unfortunately THE ORGAN WAS NOT INVOLVED IN THE END!! To be honest, that is my main disappointment of the performance, apart from minor wrong note playing from the horns.
It also needs to be noticed that the woodwinds section lift their instruments when playing several passages, as with the horn section. There were 30 violins (16 first, 14 second), the largest I've seen so far, if I remember correctly. There was a poor violist who played by herself behind the other pairs because there was no more room in the stage to fit another violist. And what sound did 10 horns make in the end! The 85% full hall gave a rousing applause at the conclusion of the piece. It must have been around 10 minutes of applause for the orchestra in the end.
For me, I practically had goose bumps all over during the first and third movements. In the fifth movement, I can barely contain myself to not join the choir singing the Resurrection text and also not to sing out the main theme from the orchestra of which I know by heart. I left the concert emotionally drained. Such an effect this symphony has for its listeners, I am still moved every time (although I've listened to it for 30-40 times already). This concert serves as a reminder to me: Mahler is always best live. And also, "Wouldn't you just die without Mahler?"
Next concert: Ashkenazy (Yes, Vladimir Ashkenazy) in Strauss' epic Also Sprach Zarathustra + Janine Jansen playing Saint Saens' 3rd violin concerto next week.
Saturday, 28 February 2009
Some interesting music I've recently discovered
Prokofiev's 3rd Piano Concerto - AWESOME! It's so witty, it's so Prokofiev. The coda of the last movement is like a never ending ecstasy. The relentless strings against the piano - very exciting!
Schubert's D. 958 (Piano Sonata #19), D. 959 (Piano Sonata #20), and D. 944 (Symphony No. 9). Schubert is moving up fast in my playlist. He wrote music with such purity and brilliance, I cannot fail to stand in awe when listening to his music. The slow movements of both D. 958 and D. 959 can bring me down anytime, while the slow movement of D. 944 stuck in my head for hours when I first time listened to it. I am never and will never be tired when listening to his masterpieces. They're just timeless.
Berlioz's Harold in Italy - after several listening, I begin to like this piece very much. It's like Symphony Fantastique, but just a tad less fantastic. It's still great anyway.
Mahler's 9th symphony - a tough one to crack, just like the rest of Mahler. But as usual, the reward of being persistent listening to it is very high! I can't say I understand the symphony perfectly - who ever does? - but if you're not carried away in the climax of the finale where basically it seems like Mahler himself is finally saying his last goodbye to the world in a very neurotic fashion, something is seriously wrong with you.
Bach's Goldberg Variations - what a piece! I bought Pinnock's recording of it on the harpsichord. Wonderful recording and playing. I've also listened to Gould's 81 recording in Youtube. Vastly different interpretation and sound (piano vs. harpsichord), but they're both very enjoyable. The minor key variations are something special, the canons are amazing. And what an effect that Aria has when it is played again in the end! It's like telling the listener, you have arrived at the end of the journey, sit back and relax, reminisce about the journeys you just took while not forgetting where you start your journey from. Glorious piece!
Schubert's D. 958 (Piano Sonata #19), D. 959 (Piano Sonata #20), and D. 944 (Symphony No. 9). Schubert is moving up fast in my playlist. He wrote music with such purity and brilliance, I cannot fail to stand in awe when listening to his music. The slow movements of both D. 958 and D. 959 can bring me down anytime, while the slow movement of D. 944 stuck in my head for hours when I first time listened to it. I am never and will never be tired when listening to his masterpieces. They're just timeless.
Berlioz's Harold in Italy - after several listening, I begin to like this piece very much. It's like Symphony Fantastique, but just a tad less fantastic. It's still great anyway.
Mahler's 9th symphony - a tough one to crack, just like the rest of Mahler. But as usual, the reward of being persistent listening to it is very high! I can't say I understand the symphony perfectly - who ever does? - but if you're not carried away in the climax of the finale where basically it seems like Mahler himself is finally saying his last goodbye to the world in a very neurotic fashion, something is seriously wrong with you.
Bach's Goldberg Variations - what a piece! I bought Pinnock's recording of it on the harpsichord. Wonderful recording and playing. I've also listened to Gould's 81 recording in Youtube. Vastly different interpretation and sound (piano vs. harpsichord), but they're both very enjoyable. The minor key variations are something special, the canons are amazing. And what an effect that Aria has when it is played again in the end! It's like telling the listener, you have arrived at the end of the journey, sit back and relax, reminisce about the journeys you just took while not forgetting where you start your journey from. Glorious piece!
Monday, 30 June 2008
Mahler's 9th Symphony - A first listening
I finally managed to pick myself up and have the courage to listen to this critic-branded 'earth-shattering' symphony. It wasn't earth-shattering for me at the moment, a problem that I always have with Mahler's music. For the recording, I picked to listen to Karajan's famous 1982-live recordings with the Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra.
Verdict:
The first movement was fantastic up until around the half-way mark, where the climax of the orchestra was really frightening. I had goosebumps all over me during this period and I'm sure everybody would too. After that, I expected more development but only to be disappointed with the music turning calm and calmer till the end of the movement. The very end of this movement has a very unique note, that for some unexplainable reason, sticks to me. Listen to it yourself and you'll see what I am talking about.
The second movement started out as a dance, but then it's not so dance like anymore. It kinda reminded me of the Scherzo of his 2nd symphony.
The third movement was the one that impressed me the best - it's very much like an orchestra showpiece. But the music itself sounded sarcastic from the very first note till the last note. I guess that's what it intended to sound like as Mahler wrote this movement as 'Rondo Burleske'.
The last movement moved me, close to tears, but right now the top slow movement of Mahler for me is still the slow movement of his sixth symphony. It is widely recognised as the acceptance of death, parting to this world. Perhaps, being a young man, death is something that I haven't thought much yet. I have the same problems with another movement of Mahler that supposedly meaning 'farewell to the earth' - the last movement of Das Lied von Der Erde. I can understand it musically, I gain something out of the movement, but I still cannot view this movement as how it is supposed to represent. Maybe this is just the naive side of me that have not had the slightest idea yet how to accept fate that is coming to you.
Conclusion: nothing to conclude but to listen to it again! I have Bernstein's, Abbado's and Walter's recording of this symphony and it should be interesting to compare the performance of each recordings. Hopefully one of them can help me understand the last movement better, so that I'll gain more out of it than what I gained of it at the moment.
Verdict:
The first movement was fantastic up until around the half-way mark, where the climax of the orchestra was really frightening. I had goosebumps all over me during this period and I'm sure everybody would too. After that, I expected more development but only to be disappointed with the music turning calm and calmer till the end of the movement. The very end of this movement has a very unique note, that for some unexplainable reason, sticks to me. Listen to it yourself and you'll see what I am talking about.
The second movement started out as a dance, but then it's not so dance like anymore. It kinda reminded me of the Scherzo of his 2nd symphony.
The third movement was the one that impressed me the best - it's very much like an orchestra showpiece. But the music itself sounded sarcastic from the very first note till the last note. I guess that's what it intended to sound like as Mahler wrote this movement as 'Rondo Burleske'.
The last movement moved me, close to tears, but right now the top slow movement of Mahler for me is still the slow movement of his sixth symphony. It is widely recognised as the acceptance of death, parting to this world. Perhaps, being a young man, death is something that I haven't thought much yet. I have the same problems with another movement of Mahler that supposedly meaning 'farewell to the earth' - the last movement of Das Lied von Der Erde. I can understand it musically, I gain something out of the movement, but I still cannot view this movement as how it is supposed to represent. Maybe this is just the naive side of me that have not had the slightest idea yet how to accept fate that is coming to you.
Conclusion: nothing to conclude but to listen to it again! I have Bernstein's, Abbado's and Walter's recording of this symphony and it should be interesting to compare the performance of each recordings. Hopefully one of them can help me understand the last movement better, so that I'll gain more out of it than what I gained of it at the moment.
Tuesday, 10 June 2008
Mahler's Das Lied von der Erde
A symphony for tenor and alto for voice and orchestra is the description of this work by Mahler himself. Consisting of 6 movements, the tenor and alto are assigned 3 alternating movements starting with the tenor in the first movement and ended with alto's solo in the last movement.
After around 10 listenings of different recordings of this work, from Klemperer, Kubelik, Walter, Haitink and Horenstein, I've came to a conclusion that I prefer the Tenor movements more than I prefer the Alto's. My favourite Tenor for DLvdE is none other than Wunderlich in the Klemperer recordings. I cannot help but drop my jaw everytime I listen to him in the first song, 'The Drinking Song of Earth's Misery'. How he kept himself being outdone from the orchestra sound in the famous ape lines still wonder me. And listen to his gorgeous rendering of more delicate 'Of Youth' and 'The Drunkard in Spring' and you can tell that this recording is for the ages. Other tenors are quite good but I don't think they've ever reached Wunderlich's level.
For the Alto part, my favourite movement is the 'Of Beauty' movement. I always love the transition between the slow tempo to the galloping tempo in the middle of the song describing the arrival of horse-riding-good-looking-young-fella. And Janet Baker's rendering in Haitink's recording is the benchmark for me. She is just too exciting and I can't help myself bouncing to her voice when she delivered her fast passages after the galloping theme from the orchestra. The last movement which has always been perceived as the crown of DLvdE is a little bit too long for me, but Kathleen Ferrier's reading in Walter's recording is too overwhelming so that one cannot but to be moved by her. The second movement is just a little bit too sleepy for me but I've gained a bit more appreciation of it nowadays.
Now when will I have the courage to listen to Mahler's so called earth shattering 9th symphony..I'll make sure that I do it before the end of this month.
After around 10 listenings of different recordings of this work, from Klemperer, Kubelik, Walter, Haitink and Horenstein, I've came to a conclusion that I prefer the Tenor movements more than I prefer the Alto's. My favourite Tenor for DLvdE is none other than Wunderlich in the Klemperer recordings. I cannot help but drop my jaw everytime I listen to him in the first song, 'The Drinking Song of Earth's Misery'. How he kept himself being outdone from the orchestra sound in the famous ape lines still wonder me. And listen to his gorgeous rendering of more delicate 'Of Youth' and 'The Drunkard in Spring' and you can tell that this recording is for the ages. Other tenors are quite good but I don't think they've ever reached Wunderlich's level.
For the Alto part, my favourite movement is the 'Of Beauty' movement. I always love the transition between the slow tempo to the galloping tempo in the middle of the song describing the arrival of horse-riding-good-looking-young-fella. And Janet Baker's rendering in Haitink's recording is the benchmark for me. She is just too exciting and I can't help myself bouncing to her voice when she delivered her fast passages after the galloping theme from the orchestra. The last movement which has always been perceived as the crown of DLvdE is a little bit too long for me, but Kathleen Ferrier's reading in Walter's recording is too overwhelming so that one cannot but to be moved by her. The second movement is just a little bit too sleepy for me but I've gained a bit more appreciation of it nowadays.
Now when will I have the courage to listen to Mahler's so called earth shattering 9th symphony..I'll make sure that I do it before the end of this month.
Monday, 10 March 2008
Melbourne Symphony Orchestra concert 8 March 2008 - John Williams in Concert
Featuring:
- Olivier Messiaen Hymne
- Toru Takemitsu To the Edge of Dream
- Peter Sculthorpe Nourlangie
- Gustav Mahler Symphony No. 1 in D major
John Williams - Guitarist
Oleg Caetani - Conductor
The first 'official' concert of the season by MSO. This was one of the very first concert that I wanted to subscribe to. The reason was not the chance to see John Williams, but it was for the Mahler 1. I wanted to experience the blazing finale of Mahler's first symphony live. Not from the recordings. It also marked more than one year since I first discovered Mahler's music and his first symphony is the very first complete symphony that I listened to in full. The live Mahler was amazing, more about that later. Let's start from the first half of the concert.
The concert started with a piece by French composer, Olivier Messiaen - whose "Quartet for The End of Time" will I attend later this year. The piece is titled 'Hymne'. The piece is certainly more modern, not your average full of melody Romantic music, and there are some interesting passages in the music. However, at times, I could not catch up with the sudden change of mood and themes. This is a kind of piece that I believe need repeated listening to be appreciated better.
The second piece of the program is the one that I'm having trouble with. Takemitsu's work - noted as complex in harmony by John Williams himself and also the writer of the program notes - is a little too complex for me to enjoy. I have no other impression from this piece and for the whole time when the orchestra played the piece, I only paid attention to how John Williams played the guitar. I discovered some techniques on how to play a guitar (note that I have no idea on how to play guitar). His technique is amazing and every note is crystal clear.
The third piece pleased me the most out of the first half of the concert. Nourlangie is a depiction of Sculthorpe's feelings about Australia Kakadu National Park. It is an amazing piece of work and I loved it. The piece began slowly but yet it created a sense of being in a wide space and the solo guitar suddenly played a very nice melody - I guess it must be the folk song of Torres Strait islander. And then you heard some birds sound from the strings. A very nice effect and again it created the illusion that you are really outdoors. Then after a while, the percussion player joined the fun and played duet with Williams. The music got faster and faster just as what you expected from a movement marked "Poco Estatico". After that, the melody that we first heard from the solo guitar is now taken up by the violins and what fine melody it is!
When the piece ended, both Caetani and Williams gestured to someone in the audience, and guess who, Peter Sculthorpe in the audience. Knowing that the composer is there, the applause got louder and the composer himself looked very touched with the reception that he got.
Now for the Mahler himself, it was really really good. I thought Kubelik's recording of it is really good already, but this concert just reminded me that the best music is indeed live music. All of the sound produced by the orchestra is just superb with the woodwinds not over-powered by the brass. I am just amazed how beautiful the delicate woodwinds passages that I have not noticed before in the recording. The tempo itself is just right to my enjoyment and Caetani - conducting without the score - emphasised the contrast of the dynamics perfectly. Mahler's melody in the first movement is so infectious that I almost sang the lyric from "Ging heut morgen ubers Feld". The second movement was also well done, I enjoyed the Trio of this movement very much. The double bass solo that opened the funeral march of the third movement was also marvelous. Furthermore, because of this concert, I can further my enjoyment listening to this movement by paying more attention to the timpani strikes and the funeral march theme played by the woodwinds. The finale itself started out very loud - the loudest that music has been played in my concert experience - and played amazingly by the orchestra throughout. I especially treasured the lyric passages between the stormy opening of this movement and the second coda of the movement (when the trombone first announced the triumphant march of the very end of the symphony). The very end of the symphony was just unbelievable. What a feast of sound! When you listen to the triumphant march, you can almost believe that you overcome every problems that you will face. The audience roared right after the very last note was played. A very memorable experience that I will treasure for long time to come.
Next concert will be in 3 weeks time: the mighty Verdi's requiem. I need to start getting a recording of it now.
- Olivier Messiaen Hymne
- Toru Takemitsu To the Edge of Dream
- Peter Sculthorpe Nourlangie
- Gustav Mahler Symphony No. 1 in D major
John Williams - Guitarist
Oleg Caetani - Conductor
The first 'official' concert of the season by MSO. This was one of the very first concert that I wanted to subscribe to. The reason was not the chance to see John Williams, but it was for the Mahler 1. I wanted to experience the blazing finale of Mahler's first symphony live. Not from the recordings. It also marked more than one year since I first discovered Mahler's music and his first symphony is the very first complete symphony that I listened to in full. The live Mahler was amazing, more about that later. Let's start from the first half of the concert.
The concert started with a piece by French composer, Olivier Messiaen - whose "Quartet for The End of Time" will I attend later this year. The piece is titled 'Hymne'. The piece is certainly more modern, not your average full of melody Romantic music, and there are some interesting passages in the music. However, at times, I could not catch up with the sudden change of mood and themes. This is a kind of piece that I believe need repeated listening to be appreciated better.
The second piece of the program is the one that I'm having trouble with. Takemitsu's work - noted as complex in harmony by John Williams himself and also the writer of the program notes - is a little too complex for me to enjoy. I have no other impression from this piece and for the whole time when the orchestra played the piece, I only paid attention to how John Williams played the guitar. I discovered some techniques on how to play a guitar (note that I have no idea on how to play guitar). His technique is amazing and every note is crystal clear.
The third piece pleased me the most out of the first half of the concert. Nourlangie is a depiction of Sculthorpe's feelings about Australia Kakadu National Park. It is an amazing piece of work and I loved it. The piece began slowly but yet it created a sense of being in a wide space and the solo guitar suddenly played a very nice melody - I guess it must be the folk song of Torres Strait islander. And then you heard some birds sound from the strings. A very nice effect and again it created the illusion that you are really outdoors. Then after a while, the percussion player joined the fun and played duet with Williams. The music got faster and faster just as what you expected from a movement marked "Poco Estatico". After that, the melody that we first heard from the solo guitar is now taken up by the violins and what fine melody it is!
When the piece ended, both Caetani and Williams gestured to someone in the audience, and guess who, Peter Sculthorpe in the audience. Knowing that the composer is there, the applause got louder and the composer himself looked very touched with the reception that he got.
Now for the Mahler himself, it was really really good. I thought Kubelik's recording of it is really good already, but this concert just reminded me that the best music is indeed live music. All of the sound produced by the orchestra is just superb with the woodwinds not over-powered by the brass. I am just amazed how beautiful the delicate woodwinds passages that I have not noticed before in the recording. The tempo itself is just right to my enjoyment and Caetani - conducting without the score - emphasised the contrast of the dynamics perfectly. Mahler's melody in the first movement is so infectious that I almost sang the lyric from "Ging heut morgen ubers Feld". The second movement was also well done, I enjoyed the Trio of this movement very much. The double bass solo that opened the funeral march of the third movement was also marvelous. Furthermore, because of this concert, I can further my enjoyment listening to this movement by paying more attention to the timpani strikes and the funeral march theme played by the woodwinds. The finale itself started out very loud - the loudest that music has been played in my concert experience - and played amazingly by the orchestra throughout. I especially treasured the lyric passages between the stormy opening of this movement and the second coda of the movement (when the trombone first announced the triumphant march of the very end of the symphony). The very end of the symphony was just unbelievable. What a feast of sound! When you listen to the triumphant march, you can almost believe that you overcome every problems that you will face. The audience roared right after the very last note was played. A very memorable experience that I will treasure for long time to come.
Next concert will be in 3 weeks time: the mighty Verdi's requiem. I need to start getting a recording of it now.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)